[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: User-defined pseudovectors
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: User-defined pseudovectors |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:42:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> The difference in return value from functions like vectorp and type-of
> is the entire point, actually.
It seems like a small benefit. I understand it might be handy for your
Common-Lisp implementation, but you can already define your own
`vectorp' to get the same result. Implementing a language on top of
another will always come with such costs because of (sometimes
subtle) mismatches.
Maybe the Guile guys are more likely to be wiling to make changes to
their system in order to better support some other language (such as
Common-Lisp).
Stefan
- RFC: User-defined pseudovectors, Lars Brinkhoff, 2013/10/10
- Re: RFC: User-defined pseudovectors, Lars Brinkhoff, 2013/10/10
- Re: RFC: User-defined pseudovectors, Dmitry Antipov, 2013/10/10
- Re: RFC: User-defined pseudovectors, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/10
- Re: RFC: User-defined pseudovectors, Lars Brinkhoff, 2013/10/10
- Re: RFC: User-defined pseudovectors,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: RFC: User-defined pseudovectors, Lars Brinkhoff, 2013/10/11
- Re: RFC: User-defined pseudovectors, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/11
- User-defined record types, Lars Brinkhoff, 2013/10/12
- Re: User-defined record types, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/15
- Re: User-defined record types, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/10/18
- Re: User-defined record types, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/18
- Re: User-defined record types, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/10/18
- Re: User-defined record types, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/18
- RE: User-defined record types, Drew Adams, 2013/10/18
- Re: User-defined record types, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/10/19