Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only

[Sebastian Wiesner]

2013/11/25 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>:
>> I presume I'd just patch `byte-compile-form' in bytecomp.el to also
>> look at a corresponding property, e.g. `interactive-use-only`.
>> Anything else?
>
> We should also make byte-compile-interactive-only-functions obsolete and
> default it to nil (i.e. move its contents to symbol properties).

What should the value of the new symbol property be?  Just t, for the
same semantics as the variable, or probably a string, which points to
the alternative supposed to be used from Lisp?