Re: Using `save-window-excursion' instead of `save-excursion' for `comment-region'?

[Bastien]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> I think your analysis is exactly right, and the reason why
> save-window-excursion doesn't exhibit the problem is because
> save-window-excursion does not save-excursion in the current buffer.
> I.e. paradoxically it's because it "preserves less" rather than because
> it "preserves more".  Replacing the save-excursion with
> save-current-buffer would probably work as well.

I see, thanks.

I've fixed the problem in Org by creating `org-comment-dwim',
which use comment-dwim when outside a source block, and
`org-babel-do-in-edit-buffer' (directly, not wrapped into
comment-region) when the point is within a buffer.

Aaron, thanks for your input and for testing this heavily.

-- 
 Bastien