[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move
|
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
|
Subject: |
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move |
|
Date: |
Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:12:36 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden>:
> I don't insist that Emacs should stay with bzr. I chose to support
> bzr because it was still a contender at the time.
Thank you.
And yes, it was. It wouldn't have been my choice, but it was
light-years better than CVS and a clear improvement over any
possibility other than hg or git.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., (continued)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Richard Stallman, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David Kastrup, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David Kastrup, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David Kastrup, 2014/01/07
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/07
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Rüdiger Sonderfeld, 2014/01/07
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move,
Eric S. Raymond <=
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Sam Steingold, 2014/01/02
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, David Reitter, 2014/01/03