|
| From: | Daniel Colascione |
| Subject: | Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. |
| Date: | Thu, 02 Jan 2014 11:51:55 -0800 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
On 01/02/2014 11:48 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I've learned to appreciate Bzr and have trouble reproducing my workflow with Git (especially the shared repository which Git seems only able to somewhat approximate in a half-assed way, not mentioning the lightweight checkouts which Git seems unable to handle).
What do you mean? git clone will use hardlinks when cloning a local repository, so it's very fast for me. Isn't speed (and some space efficiency) the reason to use bzr shared repositories?
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |