[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apologia for bzr
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Apologia for bzr |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:49:21 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> I think getting new blood into emacs devel is critical or we might find
>> ourselves in the same situation as bzr a few years later.
> I agree about the need, but have my doubts about the results. We've
> heard similar arguments for switching from CVS, too. I hope I will be
> proven wrong.
Using Git won't magically give us any new blood. But using Bzr is
a hindrance. A few years ago, users seemed happy to use Hg for one
project, Git for another, DaRCS for yet a third, etc....
Nowadays most users complain when they have to learn another tool.
Stefan
- Re: Apologia for bzr, (continued)
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Leo Liu, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Apologia for bzr, David Kastrup, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Josh, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Karl Fogel, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Karl Fogel, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/03