Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git

[Karl Fogel]

Rostislav Svoboda <address@hidden> writes:
>Is anybody out there able to convert this "git vs. hg" discussion from
>feelings into numbers?

I've been saving all the messages, and would have bothered to count if
it weren't so obviously leaning heavily toward git (I've been keeping an
informal count as I see the messages go by).  If someone really feels we
need the numbers, they are in the archives -- "just add labor" :-).  But
most people seem to be talking as though git is already the obvious
winner, and I think they're doing that based on the same informal count.

-K