[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dealing with local patches - mercurial queues over bzr/git checkout
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: dealing with local patches - mercurial queues over bzr/git checkout |
|
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jan 2014 22:33:16 +0200 |
> From: Barry Warsaw <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:49:27 -0500
>
> I agree that this is a great workflow, which feels very natural in bzr thanks
> to its emphasis on mainline development. But that's going to work quite
> differently in git, since as Stephen has pointed out, git bisect seems to lack
> a --first-parent switch (which log and rev-list have, though sadly are not the
> default).
Can't argue with you about git (yet), but one can still bisect
manually, right? The branch commits are not lost in the merge, right?