[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr]
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr] |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Jan 2014 06:48:52 -0800 (PST) |
> users can get the impression that Emacs is not for them because it's weird.
> If they in just the first half hour of using Emacs meet several such things
> they may conclude that working with Emacs will continue to be like this;
> now and then it will turn out that it doesn't work as "expected" and that
> there are new names for everything, etc. Why not use That Other Editor
> that some other people suggested instead?
Why not, indeed? Problem solved.
At ease; false alarm. Circulez ; il n'y a rien a voir.
(And _you_ are not using That Other Editor why? Did you perhaps spend
more than 1/2 hour learning This Old Editor?)
- Re: Great Old One?, (continued)
- Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/07
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/07
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Yuri Khan, 2014/01/07
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/07
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/07
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Jose E. Marchesi, 2014/01/07
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Per Starbäck, 2014/01/09
- RE: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr],
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Per Starbäck, 2014/01/09
- RE: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Drew Adams, 2014/01/09
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Per Starbäck, 2014/01/09
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], David Kastrup, 2014/01/09
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Tom, 2014/01/09
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], David Kastrup, 2014/01/09
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Davis Herring, 2014/01/10
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], David Kastrup, 2014/01/10
- RE: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Drew Adams, 2014/01/09
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Richard Stallman, 2014/01/10