[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2 |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jan 2014 23:04:46 +0200 |
> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:42:23 -0500
> From: "Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> > Please read the previous two paragraphs together. You ridicule Eli for
> > not managing to fix your breakage in the first try, and then state that
> > you yourself have no idea what caused it.
>
> !!! I wasn't ridiculing Eli, I was implicitly poking fun at myself. The
> antecedent of "his own comic pratfall" is that *I* took one.
>
> As for the rest of your response, I'll pass over it in polite silence.
> But your chances of successfully influencing my future behavior just
> decreased.
Guys? Can we please all cool down here and put this incident behind
us? Anyone could make a mistake (even me ;-).
I'd still want to know what's wrong with the original code, because I
cannot see anything wrong with it.
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, (continued)
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Glenn Morris, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Glenn Morris, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, David Kastrup, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, David Kastrup, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/13