Re: delay archive for "important" bugs

[Glenn Morris]

Michael Albinus wrote:

>> Really?  Earlier today, 15344 was not "closed" AFAICT but anyway, i had
>> to "unarchive" it to be able to continue its thread (via bug-gnu-emacs).
>> (A previous mail went to /dev/null.)
>
> Hmm. On "Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:19:04 -0400", this bug was confirmed by
> Glenn (see message #22). Maybe this triggers also archiving after 4
> weeks, dunno.

No, of course it does not. The bug was never archived. This is all just
a misunderstanding. If you search for 100 bugs, you will never see more
than 100 bugs. If the one you expected to see is not there, it does not
mean it was archived.

>> If a bug is "important", i think it should be visible longer on the
>> default "browse" link, reproduced here:
>
> Sure.

Disagree. The "default browse link" is just the most 100 recent reports.

If you want to see important ones, use eg

http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?include=severity%3Aimportant;package=emacs