Re: Why the odd interactive form in byte-compile-file?

[Thien-Thi Nguyen]

() Daniel Colascione <address@hidden>
() Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:00:02 -0800

   > Is there some deeper reason we're not using code that looks like this?
   >
   > (interactive
   >     (list (read-file-name (if current-prefix-arg
   >                               "Byte compile and load file: "
   >                             "Byte compile file: "))
   >           current-prefix-arg))

The current ‘interactive’ form supplies DIR and DEFAULT-FILENAME args to
‘read-file-name’ if the current buffer is Emacs Lisp (ish).  Those are
available to the user via ‘M-n’.

The form you propose doesn't do that.

   Ping? I'd like to treat this issue as a bugfix and change the
   interactive form to my proposal for 24.4.

Why do you want to treat this functionality as an "issue"?

-- 
Thien-Thi Nguyen
   GPG key: 4C807502
   (if you're human and you know it)
      read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical)
                               (not (via 'mailing-list)))
                     => nil

pgp8OrvnoaqFz.pgp
Description: PGP signature