[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Occur stack
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Occur stack |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:46:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> My point, namely that an easibly accessible history regenerated
> transparently is much cheaper than buffers to keep around.
I doubt that's correct. Putting the text of the buffer into a string
(and recovering it) when you hit `l' is much cheaper than running
"grep".
There will be an increased memory usage, of course, but we can limit the
history depth to something reasonable.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
- Re: Occur stack, (continued)
- Re: Occur stack, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/14
- Re: Occur stack, Allen S. Rout, 2014/01/14
- Re: Occur stack, Juri Linkov, 2014/01/15
- Re: Occur stack, David Kastrup, 2014/01/15
- Re: Occur stack, Juri Linkov, 2014/01/16
- Re: Occur stack, David Kastrup, 2014/01/16
- Re: Occur stack,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Occur stack, David Kastrup, 2014/01/16
- Re: Occur stack, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/16
- Re: Occur stack, David Kastrup, 2014/01/16
- Re: Occur stack, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/01/17
- Re: Occur stack, Tom, 2014/01/14
Re: Occur stack, Andreas Röhler, 2014/01/15