Re: Creating aliases for epa-* comands => crypt-* commands?

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> If there is no counterproposals soon, let me know and I will create
>>> the aliases for epa-* autoloaded functions.
>> I think that as long as there is no existing alternative, it makes no
>> sense to provide aliases.  And we're talking about 30 autoloaded
>> functions.
> The idea was to make epa-* easier to discover by providing a better
> prefix.  But I agree 30 aliases sounds too much.

I use EPA but have never needed to call something that has "epa" it
its name.  I just open a foo.gpg file and things "just work".
There's an "Encryption/Decryption" submenu which seems "discoverable".
In what sense does it need to be more "discoverable"?


        Stefan