Re: eww

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:04:57 -0500
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden,
>       Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> 
> > What does it need, then?
> 
> Nothing at all.  This problem with etags exists already with many other
> macros and noone cares.  That's just life: etags is approximate, it
> includes unneeded elements and lacks some elements it should have.
> It is still 99% correct for Elisp, so some people use it very happily,
> but there's no point uglifying the code just to try and make it work
> 99.01% instead.

If tagging those is important, we could use the --regex option to
etags.