Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr]

[Óscar Fuentes]

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> That's a red herring.  What people are looking for are not editors that
> are easy to learn, but editors that can be used without learning
> anything at all.

People are looking for editors that work similar enough to those that
they already know.

For most people, the *promise* of improved efficiency is not credible
enough to invest the required time to learn Emacs.

[snip]