Re: Occur stack

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Tom <address@hidden> writes:

> Here's an other experimental code which does it the other way:
> it does not store buffer contents, it reruns the command
> instead.

Storing the command, too, is also nice, because then we can re-run the
command with the `g' command.

However, re-running an external command will not, in general, give us
the same buffer we had before.  Things change, and re-running (say) grep
half an hour later might very well give us a different buffer than what
we expected (because files have changed, etc).

Having a history that presents us with ever-changing output doesn't seem
optimal. 

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/