Re: Is intellisense features integration in Emacs technically possible?

[Stefan Monnier]

> continuation". There does not seem to be a need to return a function
> which is called to run another function? Just letting the Emacs code
> know that we might add completions later and then calling some
> well-known function with additional completions once they are available
> would be sufficient I think?

It's the same, except that the "well-known" won't be a function name but
the function you receive as argument, which makes it possible for it to
be a closure that holds various side-info which can change over time.


        Stefan