[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Repo cpnversion progress report
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Repo cpnversion progress report |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Feb 2014 01:25:33 +0100 |
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> The ISO 8601 string is not that readable
I find it perfectly readable.
>, nor does it match the localtime
> clock of committer
For some of us is close enough, and anyway it is a fixed offset
(modulo DST) from your local time, so it is not opaque or a magic
cookie at all.
J
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, (continued)
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Sean Sieger, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Sean Sieger, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Karl Fogel, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Paul Eggert, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Paul Eggert, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Jan D., 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/31