[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should 'old-branches' and 'other-branches' be kept?
|
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
|
Subject: |
Re: Should 'old-branches' and 'other-branches' be kept? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:30:58 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>:
> I don't understand why those branches make any difference, unless you're
> trying to do your analysis also on those branches, which is
> not worthwhile.
I'm trying to fix up the attic filenames everywhere. They occur on the
old branches as well as on the
> Just preserve their info "as-is". The only important
> part is that if someone wants to look at them he doesn't need to go back
> to Bzr.
OK, I believe I've worked out a way to do that.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>