[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"? |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:25:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: Joshua Judson Rosen <address@hidden>
>> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 00:53:00 -0500
>>
>> > > > > revno: 111954.1.4
>> > > > > committer: K. Handa <address@hidden>
>> > > > > branch nick: work
>> > > > > timestamp: Fri 2013-03-22 00:18:44 +0900
>> > > > > message:
>> > > > > Fix a bug introduced by revno:111954.1.97
>> > > > >
>> > > > > It doesn't show up in a bzr log --levels=0 listing, and the fact that
>> > > > > 97 > 4 suggests the reference is garbled.
>> > > >
>> > > > I think the correct reference is 111964.1.6. It was merged in
>> > > > r112051.
>> > >
>> > > ... and the "revno:111954.1.97" was a reference to trunk revno:112051.
>> >
>> > No, it isn't, IMO: they have different parents.
>>
>> They actually don't have different parents--they have the same revid,
>> and really _are_ the same revision-object.
>
> No, they haven't, and no, they aren't:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> revno: 111964.1.6
revno:111954.1.97 refers to revno:112051, not revno:111964.1.6.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, (continued)
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Andreas Schwab, 2014/03/02
- Policy on referencing/abbreviating git commit-IDs, going forward? (was: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?), Joshua Judson Rosen, 2014/03/02
- Re: Policy on referencing/abbreviating git commit-IDs, going forward?, Andreas Schwab, 2014/03/02
- Re: Policy on referencing/abbreviating git commit-IDs, going forward?, Joshua Judson Rosen, 2014/03/02
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/02
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Andreas Schwab, 2014/03/02
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/01
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/01
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Joshua Judson Rosen, 2014/03/02
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/02
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/02
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Andreas Schwab, 2014/03/02
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/02
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Andreas Schwab, 2014/03/02
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/02
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/02
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/03
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/03
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Joshua Judson Rosen, 2014/03/02
- Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/02