Re: [PATCH] eww-mode-map doesn't bind TAB on tty.

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:

> Mario Lang <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> And here is the result of grepping for the pattern in all Emacs Lisp files:
>
> Thanks; I'll replace all those (except the image-dired one)...

Actually...  before I do that...

Some modes define both [?\M-\t] (or "\e\t"), which are the same thing, I
think, as well as [backtab].  Same for [tab].  Like:

    (define-key map "\t" 'widget-forward)
    (define-key map "\e\t" 'widget-backward)
    (define-key map [(shift tab)] 'widget-backward)
    (put 'widget-backward :advertised-binding [(shift tab)])
    (define-key map [backtab] 'widget-backward)

Are there situations where just removing the latter binding is wrong?
I.e., is there a difference between [?\M-\t] and [backtab] that should
be preserved?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/