Re: [PATCH] eww-mode-map doesn't bind TAB on tty.

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
>> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:10:01 +0100
>> 
>>     (define-key map "\t" 'widget-forward)
>>     (define-key map "\e\t" 'widget-backward)
>>     (define-key map [(shift tab)] 'widget-backward)
>>     (put 'widget-backward :advertised-binding [(shift tab)])
>>     (define-key map [backtab] 'widget-backward)
>> 
>> Are there situations where just removing the latter binding is wrong?
>> I.e., is there a difference between [?\M-\t] and [backtab] that should
>> be preserved?
>
> If both are present, I don't think you should delete one of them.
> E.g., some terminal might define an escape sequence to [backtab].

Hm.  Should we always have two bindings each for [tab] and [backtab],
then?  This all seems kinda inconsistent.

And should perhaps wait until after the feature freeze, anyway.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/