[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp
|
From: |
Barry OReilly |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp |
|
Date: |
Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:51:11 -0400 |
Richard,
The argument was made that at the present time, writers of proprietary
compilers would choose to leverage Clang rather than GCC, even if GCC
liberalized the availability of its AST. If this is true, then there
is no longer political value to restrict GCC. You sound unconvinced
that this describes the choices software proprietors would make. Would
you expand more on that?
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, (continued)
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/04
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, David Kastrup, 2014/03/04
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/04
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/03/05
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Jambunathan K, 2014/03/11
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/03
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/03
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp,
Barry OReilly <=
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Michał Nazarewicz, 2014/03/26
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Michal Nazarewicz, 2014/03/27
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, David Kastrup, 2014/03/27
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/27
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/28
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Glenn Morris, 2014/03/28
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/29
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/29
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/29