[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 12:49:42 +0900 |
Eric S. Raymond writes:
> MON KEY = MON KEY <address@hidden>
Asian, IIRC, and if so, no problem.
> Nix = Nix <address@hidden>
Change that one and I won't know who you're talking about. Nix is
Nix.
> More generally, what do we consider most useful in the event of
> a personal name change: name at time of contribution or most
> recent name? I have no particular opinion about this.
I think leaving a little fuzz in the statistics is the most important
consideration. We are human beings, not numbers.
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, (continued)
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Andreas Schwab, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Andreas Schwab, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, David Kastrup, 2014/03/31
Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=