[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: One more string functions change
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: One more string functions change |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jun 2014 19:48:34 +0300 |
> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 20:38:26 +0400
> From: Dmitry Antipov <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> On 06/29/2014 07:13 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > It's possible that we should consider this now, but the answer to your
> > question is not a trivial one in any case. Emacs traditionally
> > exposed to Lisp all the Unicode character properties, as char-tables.
>
> Are these exposed properties really used from Lisp in a high-level,
> user-defined manner? For example, is it desirable/possible to customize
> related things via .emacs? Or is there major/minor mode which relies
> on the Lisp-visible character properties?
These are exactly the questions we should ask ourselves. I don't know
the answers off-hand, and I don't think these issues were discussed in
the past.
- Re: One more string functions change, (continued)
- Re: One more string functions change, Andreas Schwab, 2014/06/27
- Re: One more string functions change, Paul Eggert, 2014/06/27
- Re: One more string functions change, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/27
- Re: One more string functions change, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/06/28
- Re: One more string functions change, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/28
- Re: One more string functions change, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/06/28
- Re: One more string functions change, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/29
- Re: One more string functions change, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/06/29
- Re: One more string functions change,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Internationalize Emacs's messages [Was: Re: One more string functions change], Dmitry Antipov, 2014/06/30
- Re: One more string functions change, Yuri Khan, 2014/06/28
RE: One more string functions change, Drew Adams, 2014/06/27