Re: Nano-improvements (was: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r117464: Shrink Lisp_Sub_Char_Table by preferring C integers to Lisp_Objects.)

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 08:12:14 +0400
> From: Dmitry Antipov <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> 
> Of course, an universal Eli-style "we don't need nano-improvements" argument
> makes all of the above just a nonsense.

I didn't say "we don't need nano-improvements".  I said they should
take a backseat to more substantial improvements in functionality,
especially user-visible functionality.