Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp.

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

David Kastrup writes:

 > Obviously, depending on what transpires before, it is equally easy
 > to have the longer match be correct.

eval-print-last-sexp doesn't (and practically speaking, can't) depend
on the the buffer or line being syntacticly correct in any way --
except for the sexp preceding point.  So I don't think that argument
holds.

Regards,