[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: if-let and when-let: parallel or sequential
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: if-let and when-let: parallel or sequential |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:42:19 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
> if-let and when-let don’t make much sense with more than one binding
> form.
Why do you think so? If they only work for a single binding, the
benefit is really minor. It's only when you use several bindings that
the benefit becomes more significant (the alternative being either
a very deeply nested code, or separating the var's declarations from
their initialization).
Stefan
- if-let and when-let: parallel or sequential, John Mastro, 2014/08/09
- Re: if-let and when-let: parallel or sequential, Stefan Monnier, 2014/08/10
- Re: if-let and when-let: parallel or sequential, Bozhidar Batsov, 2014/08/11
- Re: if-let and when-let: parallel or sequential, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/08/11
- Re: if-let and when-let: parallel or sequential, Richard Stallman, 2014/08/11
- Re: if-let and when-let: parallel or sequential, John Mastro, 2014/08/11
- Re: if-let and when-let: parallel or sequential, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/12