[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces
From: |
Sam Steingold |
Subject: |
Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:25:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (darwin) |
> * Michael Albinus <address@hidden> [2014-08-22 08:17:31 +0200]:
>
> Sam Steingold <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>>> However, sometimes the way I connect is more convoluted, e.g., I need
>>>> to ssh to server, then sudo to the right user, only then invoke a
>>>> command.
>>>
>>> Can this be done via Tramp?
>>
>> No - I also need sudo after ssh.
>
> /ssh:address@hidden|sudo:address@hidden:
==> Host name must not match method "sudo"
BTW, this implies that all the inferior process starting functions
should be binding default-directory, e.g.:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defun sql-vertica (&optional buffer)
"Run vsql as an inferior process."
(interactive "P")
(let ((default-directory (or sql-vertica-default-directory
default-directory)))
(sql-product-interactive 'vertica buffer)))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
--
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1265
http://www.childpsy.net/ http://openvotingconsortium.org http://www.memritv.org
http://mideasttruth.com http://jihadwatch.org http://islamexposedonline.com
((lambda (x) `(,x ',x)) '(lambda (x) `(,x ',x)))
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, (continued)
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/08/21
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Stefan Monnier, 2014/08/21
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Andreas Röhler, 2014/08/22
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Phillip Lord, 2014/08/22
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Jorgen Schaefer, 2014/08/22
Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Sam Steingold, 2014/08/22
Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Andreas Schwab, 2014/08/21
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Sam Steingold, 2014/08/21
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Andreas Schwab, 2014/08/22
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Michael Albinus, 2014/08/22
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces,
Sam Steingold <=
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Michael Albinus, 2014/08/23
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Sam Steingold, 2014/08/25
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Michael Albinus, 2014/08/27
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Sam Steingold, 2014/08/27
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Michael Albinus, 2014/08/27
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Sam Steingold, 2014/08/27
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Michael Albinus, 2014/08/27
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Sam Steingold, 2014/08/27
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Michael Albinus, 2014/08/27
- Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces, Sam Steingold, 2014/08/27