[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Why was `transient-mark-mode' turned off for `delete-selection-mode'
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Why was `transient-mark-mode' turned off for `delete-selection-mode'? |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:50:19 -0700 (PDT) |
> So far, this change doesn't sound like a very good idea to me, but
> I would like to know more about it, in particular the rationale for
> it.
>
> Delete selection mode has always been about providing similar
> delete/replace-the-selection behavior to what is prevalent outside
> Emacs. Why would we now divorce this behavior from highlighting of
> the selection?
Any news on this? Thx.
- RE: Why was `transient-mark-mode' turned off for `delete-selection-mode'?,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Why was `transient-mark-mode' turned off for `delete-selection-mode'?, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/04
- RE: Why was `transient-mark-mode' turned off for `delete-selection-mode'?, Drew Adams, 2014/09/04
- Re: Why was `transient-mark-mode' turned off for `delete-selection-mode'?, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/04
- RE: Why was `transient-mark-mode' turned off for `delete-selection-mode'?, Drew Adams, 2014/09/04
- Re: Why was `transient-mark-mode' turned off for `delete-selection-mode'?, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/04
- RE: Why was `transient-mark-mode' turned off for `delete-selection-mode'?, Drew Adams, 2014/09/04
- Re: Why was `transient-mark-mode' turned off for `delete-selection-mode'?, David Kastrup, 2014/09/05
- RE: Why was `transient-mark-mode' turned off for `delete-selection-mode'?, Drew Adams, 2014/09/05
- Re: Why was `transient-mark-mode' turned off for `delete-selection-mode'?, David Kastrup, 2014/09/05
- RE: Why was `transient-mark-mode' turned off for `delete-selection-mode'?, Drew Adams, 2014/09/05