[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again))
From: |
Kristian Nygaard Jensen |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)) |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:38:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 |
> Of course, that's for the language side, but on the implementation side,
> I don't really know what Common-Lisp implementation we could re-use
> (both GNU implementations are dormant, so there's no manpower for us
> tap into). Still: there are many Common-Lisp implementations out there,
> so there's probably one that could work for us.
Embeddable Common-Lisp (http://sourceforge.net/projects/ecls/) seems
alive, it is lgpl, so there would be no license issue
--
Kristian Nygaard Jensen
Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)), Richard Stallman, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)),
Kristian Nygaard Jensen <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, James Cloos, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, James Cloos, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Thorsten Jolitz, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Sam Steingold, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Sam Steingold, 2014/09/19