[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:39:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
Tom <address@hidden> writes:
> Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>
>>
>> As mentioned in my previous message about Guile-Emacs, I tend to think
>> this would be a liability rather than a feature.
>>
>
> I don't see why. It would make it easier for people to write
> configurations for emacs if they can use a language which they already
> know and is widely used.
>
> You could still set up a rule that you only accept elisp packages
> in the core if it makes core maintenance easier. But why deny
> this feature from the users if a popular VM can easily support it?
>
> It would be a great selling point if you could say "you can use
> your favorite language to configure emacs, you don't have to use
> arcane elisp if you don't want to". It could be an additional
> convenience for the users which would make emacs more accesible
> than it is today.
LLVM is not a VM (Virtual Machine). I know, the name is confusing.
So LLVM will not allow using multiple programming languages to configure
Emacs.
Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)), Richard Stallman, 2014/09/17