[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Adding packages to ELPA
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Adding packages to ELPA |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:02:53 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Why not add them to Emacs instead?
Some packages belong in Emacs, others in ELPA. That's a practical
question, depending on what the package does, how popular it is, and
how it relates to other packages.
In general, I think packages that are libraries for other packages
should be in Emacs.
But that is orthogonal to the questions we're discussing here.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: Adding packages to ELPA, (continued)
- Re: Adding packages to ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/20
- Re: Adding packages to ELPA, Stephen Leake, 2014/09/20
- Re: Adding packages to ELPA, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/20
- Re: Adding packages to ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2014/09/22
- Re: Adding packages to ELPA, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/22
- Re: SP? {Spam?} Re: Adding packages to ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2014/09/22
- Re: Adding packages to ELPA,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Adding packages to ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Daniel Colascione, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eric Brown, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Robin Templeton, 2014/09/20
Re: Guile emacs thread (again), LluĂs, 2014/09/17