[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Oct 2014 13:10:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> > What do you think? Do I worry too much [about nothing]? :)
>
> Listen to your Uncle David on this one. You should treat every
> instance of nil as a biohazard.
That would make about as much sense as treating every bacterium as a
biohazard. The nil problem is going to be defining the relation between
Elisp and Scheme programming like pointers define the relation between C
and algorithms.
The Fortran language is defined in a manner that when you use aliasing,
anything can happen.
The C language is defined in a manner that when you don't use aliasing,
nothing can happen.
--
David Kastrup