[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
|
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
|
Date: |
Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:56:22 +0900 |
David Kastrup writes:
> like pointers define the relation between C and algorithms.
Did somebody mention biohazards?
It seems to me that the analogy between passing Lisp nil to Scheme and
passing C pointers to anything is quite good at a high level. Every
instance must be check up down and sideways for possible hazards.
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/10/05
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/05
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/05
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07