[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:09:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
() Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
() Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:15:20 -0400
Do people write spam/virus checkers using Guile?
This issue is specifically about Guile.
Two examples that jump to mind:
GNU Mailutils (http://www.gnu.org/software/mailutils/),
specifically its "Sieve" handling (based on RFC 3028),
is extensible w/ Guile.
In ttn-do (http://www.gnuvola.org/software/ttn-do/),
the program "magic" is a file(1)-workalike, which basically
means it trundles through unknown byte sequences, sometimes
interpreting them as strings.
--
Thien-Thi Nguyen
GPG key: 4C807502
(if you're human and you know it)
read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical)
(not (via 'mailing-list)))
=> nil
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/05
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/05
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/06
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/07
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/07
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/06