[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:05:25 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> Historically, any real-life risks that were reported on the Emacs
> lists were handled and fixed very quickly and without any discussions
> as to whether they should be fixed.
Fine. I prefer a more proactive approach, and I've explained why.
You don't think the explanations make sense, no problem for me. ;-)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Uwe Brauer, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Paul Eggert, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/14