[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging nth, aref, and elt.
|
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
|
Subject: |
Re: Merging nth, aref, and elt. |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:30:42 +0000 |
>> Yes, of course.
>> Arguably `elt' is already the answer.
Yes. I was away from the compuiter when I sent the other email, so
I thought maybe `elt' wasn't quite the same as nth+aref. But looking
at it now, that's exactly what it is.
So it looks like there's nothing to be done. here :-)
- Merging nth, aref, and elt., Artur Malabarba, 2014/10/29
- Re: Merging nth, aref, and elt., Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/29
- Re: Merging nth, aref, and elt., David Kastrup, 2014/10/30
- Re: Merging nth, aref, and elt.,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: Merging nth, aref, and elt., Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/31
- Re: Merging nth, aref, and elt., Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/31
- Re: Merging nth, aref, and elt., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/31
- Re: Merging nth, aref, and elt., Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/31