[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
What's the best way to write complex emacs extension
|
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
|
Subject: |
What's the best way to write complex emacs extension |
|
Date: |
Sun, 02 Nov 2014 13:12:45 +0900 |
scopeview . writes:
> failed (for example stringp) it hard to find out the failed predication
> place. (no file:function:line_number or backtrace)
edebug. XEmacs has a native Lisp debugger as well (maybe Emacs does too).
> But it seems that xemacs had stop its development.
The rumors of our death are greatly exaggerated, but this is not the
place to discuss that.