Re: Generalizing find-definition

[Stephen Leake]

Helmut Eller <address@hidden> writes:

> On Mon, Nov 03 2014, Jorgen Schaefer wrote:
>
>>> I have my own hack for this; It requires me to distinguish between
>>> variable and defun names and invoke separate keys; I hope you can
>>> remove that annoyance.
>>
>> I'm not sure how I can remove that annoyance - is that not
>> language-dependent?  What kind of functionality would you require there? 
>
> One way to solve this is to merge the list of candidates for functions
> and variables.  At least that's what we do in SLIME.  In elisp-mode
> M-. could combine the candidates of find-function and find-variable.
> Most of the time the merged list would only contain a single candidate.

+1

-- 
-- Stephe