[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sequence manipulation functions
From: |
Damien Cassou |
Subject: |
Re: sequence manipulation functions |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Nov 2014 18:22:55 +0100 |
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
> Emacs should follow Common Lisp in this regard.
why is compatibility with Common Lisp a requirement? The main Common
Lisp functions are already available in a dedicated package.
--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm."
Winston Churchill
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/20
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/21
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/21
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/21
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/21
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/24
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/24
RE: sequence manipulation functions, Drew Adams, 2014/11/05
Re: sequence manipulation functions,
Damien Cassou <=
RE: sequence manipulation functions, Drew Adams, 2014/11/05
Re: sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/05
Re: sequence manipulation functions, Tom Tromey, 2014/11/05
RE: sequence manipulation functions, Drew Adams, 2014/11/05
RE: sequence manipulation functions, Drew Adams, 2014/11/05
Re: sequence manipulation functions, Richard Stallman, 2014/11/05