Re: minor bzr->git changes missed

[Perry E. Metzger]

On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:36:07 +0200 Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> Thanks.  But why on master?  All the changes of this kind should go
> to the branch.

For reference, is there a description of the full development
process, updated for the git world, one can read? I was under the
impression that people tracking development were supposed to be
operating off of master and that the 24 branch was only for bug fixes
to 24 -- that 25 would eventually be branched off of master in other
words. Clearly this is not the correct impression...

-- 
Perry E. Metzger                address@hidden