Re: Rewriting bzrmerge.el

[David Kastrup]

David Engster <address@hidden> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>>> From: David Engster <address@hidden>
>>> So, with bzr, we could pretty easily commit only the meta-data of
>>> skipped commits, so that they were regarded as merged. But being the
>>> stupid content tracker that Git is, I think that ship has sailed.
>>
>> You mean, if I merge a commit, and then make another commit that
>> undoes all the changes of the first one, that first commit will not
>> appear in the DAG?  I'd be surprised.
>>
>> Or are you saying that if I do the above, then merge again from the
>> same branch, Git will again bring the same stuff and effectively undo
>> my undo?
>
> No. Explicitly reverting the commit is one possibility that works, but
> that's ugly and tedious, especially when the commit has conflicts (which
> is pretty common, since this is often the reason why it should be
> skipped in the first place).
>
> With Bazaar, you could gradually build up your merge in a series of
> smaller merges using different strategies (granted, that involved using
> the '--force' option, but nonetheless, it was possible). In the end,
> this lead to one single merge commit from the emacs-24 branch, which was
> nice and tidy. I was hoping one of the git experts around here could
> tell me how to do that with git.

git rebase -i

-- 
David Kastrup