[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: git apologia
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: git apologia |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Nov 2014 20:04:05 +0200 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:36:41 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Actually, it turns out neither this nor HEAD~n is what I want. What I
> > want is to display information about commits N..M where N and M are
> > ordinal numbers from the linear "git log" output. And waddaya know?
> > HEAD~n etc. seem to _skip_ merge-commits,
>
> Just like bzr does with its ordinal numbers.
No, bzr shows the merge-commit on the mainline, with a normal
(i.e. non-dotted) number. Only the commits on the branch from which
we merged are skipped by default by "bzr log".
- Re: git apologia [was: git pull fails with merge conflicts. ...], (continued)
- Re: git apologia [was: git pull fails with merge conflicts. ...], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/15
- Re: git apologia [was: git pull fails with merge conflicts. ...], David Kastrup, 2014/11/15
- Git's victory and an entertaining irony, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/11/15
- Git's victory and an entertaining irony, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/15
- Re: Git's victory and an entertaining irony, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia [was: git pull fails with merge conflicts. ...], Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/15
- Re: git apologia [was: git pull fails with merge conflicts. ...], Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/15
- Re: git apologia [was: git pull fails with merge conflicts. ...], David Kastrup, 2014/11/15
- Re: git apologia, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: git apologia, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia, Teemu Likonen, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: git apologia, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/17
- Re: git apologia, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: git apologia, David Kastrup, 2014/11/17