[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EWW buffers
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: EWW buffers |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:16:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> Actually changing the displayed buffer from a process filter
> (i.e. asynchronously) is a bad idea, just like prompting the user.
> So yes, the *eww* buffer should be created and displayed right away
> (empty at first).
> Iceweasel does the same, FWIW, so I don't think it's a problem.
True. I'll change eww to make the buffer immediately.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Network security manager, (continued)
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- EWW buffers, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/19
- Re: EWW buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- bug#19109: eww-setup-buffer: use set-buffer instead of switch-to-buffer, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/19
- Re: EWW buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/19
- Re: EWW buffers, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/20
- Re: EWW buffers,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/20
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/20
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Daniel Colascione, 2014/11/21