[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More metaproblem
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: More metaproblem |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:28:01 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> What about this one? Is refactoring to small, cohesive functions
> accepted? For example function abbrev--before-point from the first
> elisp file abbrev.el is quite big and I can imagine it's hard to test
> automatically. It could be split into couple smaller ones on single
> level of abstraction. Such functions would be easier to test
> and understand.
Indeed, we have a good number of functions that are too large for
good taste. I generally like breaking them up when I find a way to do
it cleanly.
Stefan
- Re: More metaproblem, (continued)
- Re: More metaproblem, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2014/12/08
- Re: More metaproblem, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- Re: More metaproblem, Stephen Leake, 2014/12/10
- Re: More metaproblem, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2014/12/10
- Re: More metaproblem, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/10
- Re: More metaproblem, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2014/12/10
- Re: More metaproblem,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: More metaproblem, Stephen Leake, 2014/12/05
- Re: More metaproblem, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/05
- Re: More metaproblem, Karl Fogel, 2014/12/05
- Re: More metaproblem, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/05
- Re: More metaproblem, Karl Fogel, 2014/12/05
- Re: More metaproblem, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/05
- Re: More metaproblem, Karl Fogel, 2014/12/05
- Re: More metaproblem, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/06
- Re: publicizing Emacs contribute, Stephen Leake, 2014/12/06
- Re: publicizing Emacs contribute, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/12/06