[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Naming scheme for branches which will not be merged.
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: Naming scheme for branches which will not be merged. |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:13:50 +0000 |
On 11 Dec 2014 17:29, "Stefan Monnier" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > What naming scheme should we use? Either prefix the branch name with
> > something really obvious, like “dont-merge/BRANCH-NAME”, so that
> > people who unaware of this convention don't make that mistake. Or
> > prefix it with any of the usual words that denote in-development, such
> > as “dev/BRANCH-NAME”.
>
> I vote against `dont-merge', and propose `scratch' as another contender.
Oh, I like that!