Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

David Kastrup writes:
 > "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:

 > > Personally, I don't see a huge advantage to anonymous functions
 > > anyway, not even in an interactive repl,
 > 
 > They are useful for calculated bindings.

Of course.[1]  I didn't mean anonymous functions were useless, I meant
in the contexts so far mentioned.

Footnotes: 
[1]  ISTM that that goes without saying, given that Lisp having data
and code representations using the same syntax is advertised as an
advantage.