[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function liter
|
From: |
Oleh |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal |
|
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:44:16 +0100 |
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> wrote:
> We already have plenty of libraries defining "control flow" structures;
> look at all the anaphoric-if libraries out there. ITYM "lexical
> structure", not "control structure".
Could you please add a link to the mentioned anaphoric-if libraries?
I'm curious how many there are.
- Re: Reader macros, (continued)
- Re: Reader macros, David Kastrup, 2015/01/23
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Phillip Lord, 2015/01/23
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/23
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Phillip Lord, 2015/01/23
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/23
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/23
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Phillip Lord, 2015/01/23
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/23
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/23
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Phillip Lord, 2015/01/23
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal,
Oleh <=
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Artur Malabarba, 2015/01/22